Until a few days ago, I was running Ubuntu 20.04 LTS and accidentally pressed Ctrl + Alt + F6. This made my screen turn black and I stumbled upon this question. I do not know how I fixed the problem but I managed to get back to Ubuntu and continue my work. But this key combination seemed to have damaged something on the /dev/sda5 partition.
When I restarted the computer, I got a BusyBox screen with an initframs prompt that wanted me to manually run an fsck command in order to fix /dev/sda5. (I am using a dual-boot system: Ubuntu as the primary operating system and Windows 10 Professional 64 bit as the secondary operating system. Windows is located on /dev/sda4.) So, I ran fsck /dev/sda5 and typed y every time I was asked if something should be fixed. When the process was finished, I tried writing reboot but that did not work. So, I typed exit and Ubuntu 20.04 LTS started working but it was slower than usually.
I then finally upgraded my Ubuntu version from Ubuntu 20.04 LTS to Ubuntu 22.04 LTS. At first, everything seemed to work quite well but the new version of Ubuntu tended to be slow as well. When I restarted the computer, problems arose again. This time, I got a kernel panic like this:
[ 0.106049] x86/cpu: SGX disabled by BIOS.
[ 0.106049] RETBleed:WARNING: Spectre v2 mitigation leaves CPU vulnerable to RETBleed attacks, data leaks possible!
[ 0.370778] tpm_crb MSFT0101:00: [Firmware Bug]: ACPI region does not cover the entire command/responses buffer. [mem 0xfed40000-0xfed4087f flags 0x200] vs fed40080 f80
[ 0.370790] tpm_crb MSFT0101:00: [Firmware Bug]: ACPI region does not cover the entire command/responses buffer. [mem 0xfed40000-0xfed4087f flags 0x200] vs fed40080 f80
[ 0.483021] Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(0,0)
[ 0.483111] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.15.0-47-generic #51-Ubuntu
[ 0.483179] Hardware name: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. GL62M 7REX/MS-16J9, BIOS E16J9IMS.31C 10/24/2017
[ 0.483261] Call Trace:
[ 0.483301] <TASK>
[ 0.483322] show_stack+0x52/0x5c
[ 0.483363] dump_stack_lvl+0x4a/0x63
[ 0.483401] dump_stack+0x10/0x16
[ 0.483433] panic+0x149/0x321
[ 0.483467] mount_block_root+0x144/0x1dd
[ 0.483506] mount_root+0x10c/0x11c
[ 0.483539] prepare_namespace+0x13f/0x191
[ 0.483576] kernel_init_freeable+0x18c/0x1b5
[ 0.483616] ? rest_init+0x100/0x100
[ 0.483651] kernel_init+0x1b/0x150
[ 0.483685] ? rest_init+0x100/0x100
[ 0.483719] ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
[ 0.483758] </TASK>
[ 0.483842] Kernel Offset: 0x29a00000 from 0xffffffff81000000 (relocation range: 0xffffffff80000000-0xffffffffbfffffff)
[ 0.483926] ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(0,0) ]---
But even after the kernel panic appeared, I was able to restart the computer, run fsck /dev/dsa5 again and Ubuntu 22.04 LTS started working as before (in a more or less usable state considering its speed when it came to applications like, for example, Firefox).
I then found this question but I am not able to reproduce the steps of answer 1 nor the steps described in answer 2.
When I restarted the computer again, the computer seemed to try to boot Ubuntu but failed. So, it then tried to boot Windows but Windows wanted to repair files in order to boot. However, Windows also failed to do that. Then, I restarted my computer again an pressed F11 which enabled me to get to the GNU GRUB Version 2.06. It offered me the option to start Ubuntu in recovery mode. When I opened this option, I was able to choose from four options:
Ubuntu, with Linux 5.15.0-47-genericUbuntu, with Linux 5.15.0-47-generic (recovery mode)Ubuntu, with Linux 5.4.0-125-genericUbuntu, with Linux 5.4.0-125-generic (recovery mode)
I first tried to pick option 4 but that did not work. (As far as I know, a kernel panic appeared again when I tried to do this (but I am not sure anymore if that was the case).) When I restarted the computer, I picked option 1 and got the following screen:
[ 0.112973] x86/cpu: SGX disabled by BIOS.
[ 0.448809] tpm_crb MSFT0101:00: [Firmware Bug]: ACPI region does not cover the entire command/responses buffer. [mem 0xfed40000-0xfed4087f flags 0x200] vs fed40080 f80
[ 0.448826] tpm_crb MSFT0101:00: [Firmware Bug]: ACPI region does not cover the entire command/responses buffer. [mem 0xfed40000-0xfed4087f flags 0x200] vs fed40080 f80
/dev/sda5 contains a file system with errors, check forced.
Deleted inode 1179964 has zero dtime. FIXED.
Inodes that were part of a corrupted orphan linked list found.
/dev/sda5: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY: RUN fsck MANUALLY.
(i.e., without -a or -p options)
fsck exited with status code 4
The root filesystem on /dev/sda5 requires a manual fsck
BusyBox v1.30.1 (Ubuntu 1:1.30.1-7ubuntu3) built-in shell (ash)
Enter 'help' for a list of built-in commands
(initframs)
I now ran fsck /dev/sda5 -y and got the following output (... stands for an omission because the command ran too fast and I was not able to record every output):
(initframs) fsck /dev/sda5 -y
fsck from util-linux 2.37.2
e2fsck 1.46.5 (30-Dec-2021)
/dev/sda5 contains a file system with errors, check forced.
Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
Inodes that were part of a corrupted orphan linked list found. Fix? yes
Inode 4718704 was part of the orphaned inode list. FIXED.
Inode 4718839 was part of the orphaned inode list. FIXED.
Inode 4719315 was part of the orphaned inode list. FIXED.
Inode 4719471 was part of the orphaned inode list. FIXED.
Inode 4720219 was part of the orphaned inode list. FIXED.
Inode 4720221 was part of the orphaned inode list. FIXED.
Inode 4720679 was part of the orphaned inode list. FIXED.
Inode 5506154 was part of the orphaned inode list. FIXED.
Inode 5636869 was part of the orphaned inode list. FIXED.
Inode 5636979 was part of the orphaned inode list. FIXED.
Inode 5637123 was part of the orphaned inode list. FIXED.
Inode 5637124 was part of the orphaned inode list. FIXED.
Inode 5637363 was part of the orphaned inode list. FIXED.
Inode 5637375 was part of the orphaned inode list. FIXED.
Inode 5637686 was part of the orphaned inode list. FIXED.
Inode 5637696 was part of the orphaned inode list. FIXED.
Inode 6179120 extent tree (at level 1) could be shorter. Optimize? yes
Inode 6291478 was part of the orphaned inode list. FIXED.
Pass 1E: Optimizing extent trees
Pass 2: Checking directory struture
...
Free blocks count wrong for group #707 (7156, counted=7164).
Fix? yes
Free blocks count wrong for group #737 (17164, counted=17166).
Fix? yes
Free blocks count wrong for group #754 (22353, counted=22359).
Fix? yes
Free blocks count wrong for group #755 (26341, counted=26370).
Fix? yes
Free blocks count wrong for group #756repair f (15249, counted=15257).
Fix? yes
Free blocks count wrong for group #771 (20213, counted=20234).
Fix? yes
Inode bitmap differences: -1179964 -4718704 -4718839 -4719315 -4719471 -4720219 -4720221 -4720679 -5506154 -5636869 -5636979 -(5637123--5637124) -5637363 -5637375 -5637696 -6291478
Fix? yes
Free blocks count wrong for group #144 (5663, counted=5664).
Fix? yes
Free blocks count wrong for group #576 (558, counted=565).
Fix? yes
Free blocks count wrong for group #672 (57, counted=58).
Fix? yes
Free blocks count wrong for group #688 (98, counted=106).
Fix? yes
Free blocks count wrong for group #768 (882, counted=883).
Fix? yes
Free inodes count wrong (5873275, counted=5873293).
Fix? yes
/dev/sda5: ***** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED *****
/dev/sda5: 532851/6406144 files (0.5% non-contagious), 18956397/25600000 blocks
(initframs)
Trying to write reboot does not do anything. Writing exit returns the following output …
(initframs) reboot
(initframs) exit
/dev/sda5: clean, 532851/6406144 files, 18956397/25600000 blocks
[ 1276.469780] mtd device must be supplied (device name is empty)
[ 1318.592260]
[ 1324.158825] mtd device must be supplied (device name is empty)
… and restarts Ubuntu 22.04 LTS. (Do not worry about the high number of seconds. I returned to my computer after about 20 minutes in order to type the commands.)
How can I solve the problem for good? Having such a hassle every time I start my computer cannot be the solution. And Windows has booting problems as well which, in my opinion, are caused by the Linux booting problems I have.
0 Answers