I have loads of RAM and I use very little. I also do record some screencasts with gtk-recordmydesktop
, which by default saves to /tmp
while recording. I assumed that it would mean storing to RAM as much as possible, but then I actually checked and found that /tmp
isn't mounted with tmpfs. Why is that?
I think you answered your own question. A lot of programs use
/tmp
for storing temporary files, and they can be huge.For example Brasero defaults to that directory to store a CD/DVD's image file, which can be 4.7 GB of size. It's not worth risking a serious slowdown (or a system lockup) in an out of memory situation if your RAM and swap get full.
For advanced users it's no problem to change some applications' defaults and mount
/tmp
astmpfs
. For general use it's just not worth the risk I guess.What about zram compression ?
The available space is more than 256 Mbytes, it depends on files' type.
There was an idea to use tmpfs while it has enough space, and write to disk when you run out of space: http://www.bigdbahead.com/?p=137 However, it never really took off. I've managed to get it working, but the FUSE overhead defeats any benefit of using tmpfs: http://shnatsel.blogspot.com/2011/11/miniwheatfs-aka-reliable-ramdisks.html