I'm having a really hard time trying to understand what the differences between a desktop environment and a window manager are?
EDIT: From this article by Jack Wallen:
There are basically three layers that can be included in the Linux desktop:
X Windows – This is the foundation that allows for graphic elements to be drawn on the display. X Windows builds the primitive framework that allows moving of windows, interactions with keyboard and mouse, and draws windows. This is required for any graphical desktop.
Window Manager – The Window Manager is the piece of the puzzle that controls the placement and appearance of windows. Window Managers include: Enlightenment, Afterstep, FVWM, Fluxbox, IceWM, etc. Requires X Windows but not a desktop environment.
Desktop Environment – This is where it begins to get a little fuzzy for some. A Desktop Environment includes a Window Manager but builds upon it. The Desktop Environment typically is a far more fully integrated system than a Window Manager. Requires both X Windows and a Window Manager.
Examples of desktop environments are GNOME, KDE, Cinnamon, Xfce among others)
The window manager manages your windows. It puts the window decoration around the contents including the buttons to minimize or close. It allows resizing and moving the windows around, decides which window is on top.
Metacity and Compiz are two examples from today, twm and fvwm might be remembered by old people like me.
A desktop environment gives you an overall user experience. It has the panels, the system menus, the starters, the status applets. It needs a window manager, of course, to manage the windows. It might offer a default file explorer and viewer. To streamline, it might even contain default editor, terminal program, or even e-mailer, all made to look alike and work together.
GNOME, XFCE and KDE are the best known at the moment.
What is a Window Manager?
A Window Manager is a piece of software that manages windows, allowing the windows to be opened, closed, re-sized, and moved. It is also capable of presenting menus and options to the user. It controls the look and feel of the user's GUI. With Linux or BSD, you have choices. You are free to select any number of window managers, ranging from lean-and-mean simple ones (low memory and CPU consumption), to feature-packed large ones. There are approximately 17 "mainstream" window managers, and at least 70 others.
Here is a short list of some of the more popular ones:
For a really nice website that lists them all, try www.plig.org/xwinman/.
What is a Desktop Environment?
A desktop environment (DE) usually rides on top of a Window Manager and adds many features, including panels, status bars, drag-and-drop capabilities, and a suite of integrated applications and tools. In fact, user opinions on operating systems are typically based on one thing: the Desktop Environment. Of course, the DE is only a small part of an OS, and in Linux and Unix systems, the Window Manager and/or DE can be replaced or highly customized without violating any end-user licensing agreements.
The most popular Desktop Environments for Unix/Linux are:
Of course, there are others.
Source (Archived).
I'll try to be brief. Taking Ubuntu for an example:
The picture and words from Wikipedia is helpful when I feel really confused by those concepts. display server and DE
There are not clear-cut definitions to distinguish them but there are strong patterns.
Classical functions of a window manager (WM)
Classical functions of a desktop environment (DE)
Some will mention menus (such as Windows' start menu), task-bars and window lists, but, for example, despite Icewm features those, it is a WM, not a DE.
That's because a fundamental point of DEs is that they ship their own set of general purpose GUI applications, such as file managers, image viewers, calendars, and so on.
Additionally, quintessential to DEs is a set of GUI utilities for configuration, not only of the DE itself but also of system parameters that could otherwise be controlled via command-line (CLI). Examples:
setxkbmap
CLI utility. But DEs provide a GUI to manage that, so that users do not have to learn or fuss with the CLI syntax. Likewise,Evidence and references
You don't need to believe me, just look at some packages dependencies in Ubuntu repositories:
KDE includes
kmail
,muon
(software center),kate
(editor),juk
(music player),gwenview
(image viewer),systemsettings
(recommended),dolphin
(file-manager).XFCE includes
thunar
(file-manager),orage
(calendar),xfce4-settings
.GNOME includes
shotwell
(image viewer),libreoffice
,gnome-screenshot
, and a bunch of others viagnome-core
dependency:nautilus
(file manager),gnome-software
(software center),baobab
(disk usage),gnome-control-center
(settings).and contrast them with window-managers — I3, Xmonad, Icewm, Bspwm —, whose dependencies are system libraries, not GUI programs at all besides the old, classical
x11-utils
.Conclusion
DEs are heavier than WMs.
In a sense, DEs act as a valuable bridge for those migrating from Windows/Mac, who are generally heavily GUI reliant, to the GNU/Linux world, that is historically more CLI oriented.
That's why some advanced users call DEs bloated. From their point of view, it includes a lot of graphical interface for tasks that are simple to achieve via a command-line. And how come DEs feature a whole bunch of default programs? Such users want to build their own tool-set and can easily do so; They only need a WM to perform the basic and indispensable window operations.
Don't let snobs drive you away, though. Use whatever you are most comfortable with and gets the job done. If you are curious and want to find out what's happening under the hood and how to deal with the CLI, you'll probably find to be slowly steering away from DEs.
The XFCE website has a pretty nice explanation of the components included in the XFCE desktop environment (one of them being a window manager):
link: https://www.xfce.org/about
IMHO the Desktop Environment term derives from Window Manager term. As a Desktop Environment is a set of software/tools which builds today's complex visual interface(s) between human being and computer, while Window Manager serves just for creating a simple graphical interface(s) (I remember XWindows on Silicon Graphics station in 1995 :) ).
Regards, Vincenzo