Grub legacy is no longer being maintained, so distros would have to do all the work of patching it to support newer file systems like Ext4 and btrfs. That's a lot of really unnecessary work for them, and diverts dev time away from doing more useful things.
This question is not really relevant anymore, since Ubuntu 9.10 and later already have GRUB2 installed.
sudo update-grub just has still prevailed as the standard command.
sudo update-grub and sudo update-grub2 are equivalent, so it doesn't matter which one you run./usr/sbin/update-grub2 is just a symbolic link to /usr/sbin/update-grub.
There are no relevant benefits for the end-user. Only developers and distribution-maintainers benefit from grub2 over grub (see yevhenes answer)
GRUB 2's major improvements over the original GRUB include:
Grub legacy is no longer being maintained, so distros would have to do all the work of patching it to support newer file systems like Ext4 and btrfs. That's a lot of really unnecessary work for them, and diverts dev time away from doing more useful things.
This question is not really relevant anymore, since Ubuntu 9.10 and later already have GRUB2 installed.
sudo update-grub
just has still prevailed as the standard command.sudo update-grub
andsudo update-grub2
are equivalent, so it doesn't matter which one you run./usr/sbin/update-grub2
is just a symbolic link to/usr/sbin/update-grub
.There are no relevant benefits for the end-user. Only developers and distribution-maintainers benefit from grub2 over grub (see yevhenes answer)