Home / ubuntu / Questions / 832394
Accepted
Vadim Peretokin
Asked: 2016-10-03 16:48:10 +0800 CST

What does this error mean?

  • 772

The following error keeps coming up in logs:

Oct  3 09:51:36 gooseberry kernel: [15050.345601] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdb] tag#0 CDB: ATA command pass through(12)/Blank a1 06 20 da 00 00 4f c2 00 b0 00 00
Oct  3 10:01:35 gooseberry kernel: [15649.821810] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdb] tag#0 FAILED Result: hostbyte=DID_ERROR driverbyte=DRIVER_SENSE
Oct  3 10:01:35 gooseberry kernel: [15649.821817] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdb] tag#0 Sense Key : Hardware Error [current] [descriptor] 
Oct  3 10:01:35 gooseberry kernel: [15649.821820] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdb] tag#0 Add. Sense: No additional sense information
Oct  3 10:01:35 gooseberry kernel: [15649.821824] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdb] tag#0 CDB: ATA command pass through(16) 85 06 20 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 e5 00
Oct  3 10:01:36 gooseberry kernel: [15650.300873] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdb] tag#0 FAILED Result: hostbyte=DID_ERROR driverbyte=DRIVER_SENSE
Oct  3 10:01:36 gooseberry kernel: [15650.300879] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdb] tag#0 Sense Key : Hardware Error [current] [descriptor] 
Oct  3 10:01:36 gooseberry kernel: [15650.300881] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdb] tag#0 Add. Sense: No additional sense information
Oct  3 10:01:36 gooseberry kernel: [15650.300885] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdb] tag#0 CDB: ATA command pass through(12)/Blank a1 06 20 da 00 00 4f c2 00 b0 00 00

$ uname -a 
Linux gooseberry 4.4.0-38-generic #57-Ubuntu SMP Tue Sep 6 15:42:33 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
kernel

2 Answers

  1. Best Answer

    I found a bug report for Kernel version 4.6.3 and greater where this bug first appeared. It spams /var/log/syslog every 10 minutes. This bug was reported as late as Kernel version 4.7.2. Apparently Ubuntu updates to kernel 4.4.0-38 have introduced the bug now.

    Also this bug is reported with USB attached drives. Which I presume your sdb is.

    Apparently it is not a cause for concern other than the fact it spams your syslog.

    The bug report I found can be followed at: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1351305

    • 6

  2. It is quite possible it is due to this commit:

    0dec8c0d67c64401d97122e4eba347ccc5850622 is the first bad commit
commit 0dec8c0d67c64401d97122e4eba347ccc5850622
Author: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Fri May 13 12:04:06 2016 -0700

    scsi_lib: correctly retry failed zero length REQ_TYPE_FS commands

    commit a621bac3044ed6f7ec5fa0326491b2d4838bfa93 upstream.

    When SCSI was written, all commands coming from the filesystem
    (REQ_TYPE_FS commands) had data.  This meant that our signal for needing
    to complete the command was the number of bytes completed being equal to
    the number of bytes in the request.  Unfortunately, with the advent of
    flush barriers, we can now get zero length REQ_TYPE_FS commands, which
    confuse this logic because they satisfy the condition every time.  This
    means they never get retried even for retryable conditions, like UNIT
    ATTENTION because we complete them early assuming they're done.  Fix
    this by special casing the early completion condition to recognise zero
    length commands with errors and let them drop through to the retry code.

    I believe from what I understand from this fix and the errors being seen is that ATA pass-through commands with opcodes 0x85 "ATA command pass through(16)" and 0xa1 "ATA command pass through(12)/Blank" are being now (possibly erroneously) issued and hence causing these error messages.

    Looking at the ATA pass-through command data, it looks like a SMART (Self-Monitoring, Analysis and Reporting Technology) ATA command is being issued (command code 0xb0), I'm speculating perhaps this H/W is not able to handle this.

    • 4