Installing latest candidate snap package of Libreoffice (latest/candidate 7.2.4.1) within Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS doesn't show many languages, e.g. Hebrew
When installing the Flatpak version (7.2.4.1) or even the legacy Ubuntu-focal repo version (1:6.4.7-0ubuntu0.20.04.2) Hebrew locale is supported and shown.
Please add Hebrew locale to the snap versions.
All the best
Uri
So I installed Ubuntu GNOME 14.04 (which included GNOME 3.10) and noticed that GNOME Software Center isn't included and isn't available through the repositories. Then I tried installing Ubuntu 14.10 (which included GNOME 3.12 stack) and, you guessed it, no GNOME Software center. Only the Ubuntu Software center.
Any idea why the devs didn't include it even as an option? Isn't Ubuntu GNOME meant to be a vanilla-GNOME-type-of-distro?
after installing Ubuntu 12.04.1 and 12.10 respectively for over a few times, i noticed that within the Software Sources, by default, the Unsupported Updates (precise backports / quantal backports) are ticked.
By removing that source BEFORE applying the system updates, i can clearly say that it stopped many issues, like a lack of wifi driver recognition (see here: WiFi problem after Ubuntu 12.10 update ) or other issues - from originally occurring.
Is there any plan to update this issue towards Raring? By this i call to simply tick the *-security and *-updates only.
cheers.
complex issue. i bought my Mom a new desktop pc, with specs listed below (using HardInfo 0.5.1):
Two screens are connected - a 19" monitor through DVI, and a 26" HDTV through HDMI.
Ubuntu Displays shows that I can mirror displays with 1024x768 & 1440x900.
Obviously I wanted the latter. Yet it doesn't work. 1024x768 does work, with no issues at all, but when i try to set the 1440x900 - the screens flicker, it take quite a while - and eventually doesn't work, as you can see here:
no only that - i must restart the computer since it becomes super slow, until i get a kernel panic. I sent the computer to the lab, and they claimed everything is ok with the hardware. They installed Windows 7 and showed me everything is fine, as seen here:
I have a 5 year-old Dell Inspiron 1525 laptop, with a display resolution of 1280x800 (16:10). I wish to increase that resolution to at least 1440x900. Is this possible? If so - how?
Chipset: Intel GM965 Express Chipset. Graphics Processor: integrated Intel GMA X3100 graphics (Previously changed to 965 Express). LCD Display: 15.4" widescreen with a 1280 × 800 resolution, 15.4" widescreen with a 1280 × 800 resolution and TrueLife, or a 15.4" widescreen with a 1440 x 900 high resolution and TrueLife. (Wikipedia)
cheers,
Uri
I am truly happy that Ubuntu-For-Android is more than a prototype. Yet, I'm confused. I failed to fully realise this:
Cheers, and keep up the amazing work
Why are the printing setting different in Gnome Shell and Unity for Ubuntu 11.10?
I believe this may even be a bug - more than a question. But I want to refine my questions before posting them at Launchpad.
Under Ubuntu 11.10, Unity had a printing menu that looks like this: 
Yet in the Shell, it looks rather like this: 
I've connected my laptop, a Dell Inspiron 1525, to my University's wireless printing system (LPD). It was very simple under Ubuntu 10.04, and also after upgrading to Ubuntu 11.10. it was quite easy well.
The problem is - under Unity it worked out-of-the-box (just as it was in 10.04), yet under Gnome Shell it didn't.
Furthermore, printing under Shell doesn't send it to print, yet under Unity it prints just fine..
I like both DE - but prefer Shell as of today. Why is the printing issue different..?
Since 12.04 is just around the corner, and the two main applications IMO right now are the USC and U1. Due to that, is there any plan to port them completely into Kubuntu, Xubuntu and Lubuntu (also Ubuntu Studio.. but i think it's already there..)?
I think it will add the much-needed Ubuntu touch to those derivatives, so that they'll have their own personality.
i've been a long-time user of XBMC (and sometimes Boxee, but it's full of bugs..), and i wondered: it's open source, it's a stable software, and yet it's not in USC. why?
I use and enjoy Firefox on my Ubuntu 10.04.2 laptop (although Firefox needs work for the Linux/Ubuntu version).
Yet I realize that in comparison to other pieces of software that have an "Ubuntu/Debian" version (.deb file, and usually .rpm files as well). I don't see it in one of the most profound assets of the FLOSS world.
The Question is - Why?
If Google Chrome/ium can , why can't they? It will be easier to get up-to-date software and features and so forth.
Reading Canonical Design's post 4 months ago made me really intrigued using 11.04.. yet, we're already in Beta 1, feature freeze and all, and no fonts.
Is this still due to be implemented in this version?