Home / server / Questions / 137551
In Process
Paul Alexander
Asked: 2010-05-01 13:35:58 +0800 CST

--prefix to /usr/local or /opt?

  • 772

For building apps from source like git or rails I've seen recommendations to install in both /opt or /usr/local.

From what I've read so for, the designated use for both is about the same and it amounts to merely a style issue.

Is there any practical difference? Best practices?

linux directory

3 Answers

  1. The FHS says:

    A package to be installed in /opt must locate its static files in a separate /opt/ or /opt/ directory tree, where is a name that describes the software package and is the provider's LANANA registered name.

    while /usr/local hold the usual /bin/, /lib, /etc, ... hierarchy

    • 3

  2. I use /usr/local for stuff I put into the system, and I let third-party installers take /opt.

    • 3

  3. Personally, I like to install everything I build from source in /opt, and edit my $PATH accordingly. It instils a sense of (semi-) cleanliness, and it's easier to traverse the folder structure, perform updates etc. It just comes down to personal preference; one is not necessarily better than the other (just like you said, a style issue).

    • 1