There's related thread on how to handle archiving. I'm asking on how to find the requirements in a company on the way archiving should be done, and also the requirements that need to be fullfilled so that archiving is actually done instead of just backups.
- How long should data be kept
- at least?
- at most?
- What about legal implications (I know depending on your region)?
- How do you ensure archiving from a policy/requirement point of view?
- How do you ensure archives can be restored from a policy/requirement point of view?
- Which data should be archived?
- ...
- ...
I'm looking for good reasoning on archiving and a framework of policies that can be adapted, not actually answers but a set of questions that may lead a path to something that will be valid in n
-months/years/decades (which of those apply already is a question actually)
Backups are there to restore things to the way they were at a previous point in time. We do backups to restore service, and usually don't think much about the underlying data.
Archives are very data focused, so you really need to think about things like classification and the information life-cycle. Much like software development, deep understanding of the business problem and development of good specs is key to a successful (and affordable implementation). EMail is pretty easy. Forms are very easy. (Retention is usually easily discernable 1040 form for 10 years, MV-22 for 2 years, etc) If your contract/procurement people are well organized, classifying that data is usually pretty easy. Random files are hard.
I work for a government agency, so our archives actually have five objectives -- objectives that often conflict and are largely out of our control. They are:
Let's talk about litigation and audit, since they are probably the most common reason to archive if you're getting started now. Now you need to think about other stuff:
Keep asking questions, you're on the right path -- there is no one answer to the archiving problem.
Rule #1: Ignore (politely) anyone that isn't paying for the archive.
All of the above answers are excellent but they leave out one thing: The important thing is "who pays for this?"
The department that pays for it has requirements: how fast data can be restored, length of time to hold the data, security requirements, etc. Other people might have "helpful advice" but if they aren't paying for it, it's just a suggestion.
Nobody wants archives. They have some external reason for needing them. Usually it is "customers" or "compliance" or a mix of both. If the answer is "customers" then some product manager should have an idea of what they need. If the answer is "compliance" then some manager should be able to explain what is required, and auditors can validate the requirements.
There should be give-and-take. After receiving the requirements, you should return with a proposal with a cost. The people needing the archives may need something less expensive and then you should be willing to negotiate (remove) features.
Sometimes the "who pay's" question is reversed. Once I was at a company where the legal department required certain docs to be archived but we had to pay for the archiving. Therefore, we put together the proposal and asked them to sign off on it. We were paying for it, but only doing the minimum to "cover our butts".
Another time I was required to archive certain data as part of a law suit. The legal department needed to track all costs associated with the law suit (I think that if we won, we could get the plaintiff to pay our costs). They gave us a special cost center code to use to buy tapes, pay for shipping, boxes, new tape drives, labor, and so on. If they hadn't been willing to pay for our costs, we would never had done such a good job.
1) Data should be kept as long as necessary according to the legal limits imposed by your industry
Meaning that if you are in the financial industry, you have different requirements than if you are in the private industry, or ISP industry, or what have you
2) legal implications are a function of #1
3) The easiest ways are to use known 3rd parties for archiving. I use Global Relay for communications archiving, because they have many, many services available in the event of an audit and so forth
4-... First you need to decide which industry you belong in, then which requirements and legal actions you fall under the jurisdiction o, then we may be able to help, but your corporate attorney would be a better person for advice. Once he gives you advice, ask a question related to what he tells you you have to archive. We can't decide that for you.
A good resource for this might be to check the sites of vendors like Iron Mountain - they're in the archiving and backup business so they've got to have some info and guidelines that should be helpful.