Home / server / Questions / 232391
In Process
Fred
Asked: 2011-02-08 14:19:24 +0800 CST

Is LSB's init script function "start_daemon" really used for real daemons or should I stick to start-stop-daemon?

  • 772

In the context of init scripts, according to the LSB specification, "Each conforming init script shall execute the commands in the file /lib/lsb/init-function", which then defines a couple of functions to be used when using daemons. One of those functions is start_daemon, which obviously "runs the specified program as a daemon" while checking if the daemon is already running.

I'm in the process of daemonizing a service app of mine, and I'm looking at how other daemons are run to try to "fit in". In the process of looking how it's done elsewhere, I noticed that not a single daemon on my Ubuntu 10.04 machine uses start_daemon. They all call start-stop-daemon directly. Same goes for my Fedora 14 machine. Should I try to play nice and be the first one to use start_daemon, or is there really no point and start-stop-daemon is the way to go since everybody is already using that? Why is there no daemons using LSB's functions?

lsb init.d

2 Answers

  1. On my system, most scripts use start-stop-daemon, but two, exim4 and incron use start-daemon.

    If you want to write scripts for portability and to comply with LSB, use start_daemon. On Ubuntu, it's implemented as a simple wrapper for start-stop-daemon.

    If you need the argument granularity provided by start-stop-daemon, use it.

    • 2

  2. On Debian (well, Ubuntu), the lsb-base package has readme (at /usr/share/doc/lsb-base/README.Debian.gz) which says:

    Note: Debian packages probably should use start-stop-daemon directly; however, these functions may be useful in porting init scripts from other distributions.

    So, software packaged specifically for Debian usually uses start-stop-daemon. I can imagine that software ported from another system might use start_daemon, although if the other system has a similar policy, then the software wouldn't be using start_daemon in the first place, so it might be no easier to port it using start_daemon than start-stop-daemon. I can also imagine that software which is packaged for many systems might use start_daemon, to enable a portable init script. Exim might be a good example of that.

    Personally, i think the readme's advice is terrible, bordering on criminal. We have a standard; if everyone adheres to it, software will be more portable, which is a good thing. Advising people not to use the standard passes on an opportunity to make the world a better place.

    • 1