Home / server / Questions / 311319
Accepted
TheCleaner
Asked: 2011-09-15 06:02:56 +0800 CST

Slow LTO4 tape drive

  • 772

EDIT UPDATE: for others seeing this thread. For me the issue was the scsi card itself for some reason. I replaced the Adaptec with an LSI and it works great now

Regardless of if I'm backing up the local server or a "disk-disk-tape" the speed writing to the tape drive is only around 350-500MB/min (not sec...min).

That's painfully slow.

Hardware:

IBM x3630 server - 12GB RAM, Windows 2008 R2

  • Here are the specs on the controller and drives:

    • 46M0916 (M5014 controller) supports up to 6 Gbps of performance throughput for each port at full duplex • 44W2234 (IBM 300GB 15K 6 Gbps SAS 3.5-inch Hot-Swap HDD) supports: o Drive to host SAS interface that supports up to 6 Gb/s burst rate o Drive media to buffer interface that supports sustained interface data transfers of up to 204 MB/s • 42D0767 2 TB 7.2K rpm 6 Gbps NL SAS 3.5-inch HS HDD) supports: o Drive to host interface that supports up to 6.0 Gb/s burst rate o Drive media to buffer interface that supports sustained interface data transfers of up to 150 MB/s average

  • SCSI Controller = Adaptec 29320LPE U320

  • Tape Drive = HP Ultrium LT04 drive SCSI inside Overland Storage Arcvault 12

Things I've done so far:

  • Updated the firmware
  • Worked with BackupExec support to increase buffers, etc.
  • Ran the HP Tape Tool software (results showed that the tape might be operating at u160 speed, and performance tests showed write speed around 9MB/sec

So, I'm at a loss. All of the hardware is decent and compatible. I'd love to just rip and replace but I'm also wanting to figure this out.

EDIT: also getting these errors on the HP Tape Tools:

The drive is experiencing polling (1.0 / sec. polling rate) on initiator ID 7. Polling can interrupt the normal operation of the drive, and significantly reduce performance.

Don't know what that means though.

backup tape windows-server-2008-r2 lto-4

5 Answers

  1. LTO can have very bad speed if you do not feed it with data at the speed of the tape. If the tape buffer becomes empty, at first, LTO will put some gaps on the tape and wait a little bit for data, then if no data is received in time it will stop and rewind. The rewind operation will slow the tape bandwidth to a crawl. See Tape Performance Problems on Wikipedia

    • 3
  2. Best Answer

    I had a problem like yours with LTO3 and the fix for me was to replace the SCSI cable. Just a thought.

    • 3

  3. We had a problem like that a few years ago before switching to fibre channel. We used close to the same card, an Adaptec 39320. We'd get occasional SCSI errors and slow performance. Our tape drive, an Overland Storage NEO2000 LTO3, was only running at U160. After talking to a couple different techs, one of them said that he had seen in the past that it had an issue using the higher speed Adaptec card. I restarted the computer, got into the SCSI card's configuration and set the speed down to 160. All my problems went away.

    It looks like your Arcvault came with an option of either 160 or 320, so check to see what it is.

    Long story short - if your Arcvault is only running at 160, set the card at 160. Also, what @Jamiko mentioned, swap your SCSI cable. I've seen that cause problems as well.

    • 2

  4. I had found that with BackupExec, under the General options, if you have the compression type set to "Hardware [if available, otherwise software]", the job will run much slower.

    Try changing that option to "Hardware [if available, otherwise none]".

    • 0

  5. I can remember that HP ships some Windows Tools (including a registry edit) to prevent Windows from polling the SCSI bus (btw: the SCSI hostadapter is usually ID 7)

    Have a look at http://support.overlandstorage.com/jive/entry.jspa?externalID=6561&categoryID=442 for more information about that.

    • 0