I've had a route in Windows Server 2008 R2 RRAS that's been working for a long time, which is 192.168.100.0/24.
The network on the other side of that link recently added a new subnet, 192.168.101.0/24
So, naturally I thought to myself, I would just modify the existing route to the following:
But no go. Nothing on the new subnet goes anywhere.
But, if I make the following setup:
Which is effectively the same route as above, just more verbose, works perfectly.
I don't mind having the two routes, but I'd really like to know why it's nessesary. Any ideas?
If you look at the route table with
route print
does it show things correctly when you have the/23
route? Does a traceroute show the traffic trying to leave the correct interface?Some times what you see in the Windows GUI does not reflect what Windows is actually doing. I find that it is always best to double check from the command line.