Am I correct in assuming that there's protection against the modification of both the subject and the extension information in a request or X509 certificate?
This signature is just another element embedded in the ASN.1 encoding?
Am I correct in assuming that there's protection against the modification of both the subject and the extension information in a request or X509 certificate?
This signature is just another element embedded in the ASN.1 encoding?
You are correct. The integrity of both of those items can be validated by the digital signatures on the request (signed with the requester's private key) or certificate (signed by the CA's private key).
Edit:
RFC 2986, section 3 describing PKCS #10 certificate requests:
and page 5:
RFC 5280 re: x.509 certificates: