I am updating some of my ansible playbooks to run on the latest version of Fedora, that now uses dnf
by default.
Since most of my playbooks should run on CentOS as well, I would like my script to run the ansible yum
command when running against a CentOS machine, and run the dnf
command (new in Ansible 1.9) when running against Fedora, but using the rest of the role as-is.
In other words, I would like to write a single operation that can intelligently pick the righ command (something akin to):
- name: Install zsh
sudo: yes
yum|dnf: name=zsh state=latest
...rather than copy-pasting the same command twice, replacing yum
with dnf
in one of the two, and then implementing some logic that says wich one of the two distinct roles to run:
- name: Install zsh (yum version)
sudo: yes
yum: name=zsh state=latest
- name: Install zsh (dnf version)
sudo: yes
dnf: name=zsh state=latest
Before somebody rushes to it: I know that yum
in an alias of dnf
on the latest Fedora, and that I could just leave the playbook as-is... My question is not about writing CentOS/Fedora compatible playbooks, my question is about picking a different command for the same parameters depending on the target environment
Ansible 2 has a generic package manager now:
http://docs.ansible.com/ansible/package_module.html
For older versions you can associate package managers via facts
Now all you need is some logic that sets
ansible_pkg_mgr
toapt
oryum
etc and all thewhen
logic goes away.Looks like Ansible are also working on doing what you want in a future module.
This is, as far as I can tell, one of the messier parts of Ansible. I've always thought that it should have a way to figure out what package manager is in use on its own, without requiring me to specify it.
In the meantime, I have lots of roles with tasks looking like this:
This gets a little unwieldy. However, it does have its advantages. If you inspect this carefully you'll notice that the CentOS version is different; it enables a repository while installing the package.
Of course there's a reason for doing it this way. On different systems you might even have different package names, so you may end up having to have different tasks for them anyway. But that's something you can shove in an OS-specific variable and then do something like:
But to extend this for
dnf
will require a bunch of extrawhen:
logic, which is a lot of work for absolutely zero gain, since dnf's yum compatibility will take care of it. Here is a place where that hypothetical "automatically figure out what package manager to use" module would be useful.But even if you had one, you'll still sometimes need to use individual package managers, because some of them have ... idiosyncrasies.
So, the best advice I can give you is: Wait until Ansible has a better way of dealing with package managers. Or write one...