Does this checkbox mean that MAPI-based RPC data will be encrypted and then encapsulated over HTTPS, resulting in double encryption?
I'm asking this question based on this understanding of terms.
We have enterprise users that want to try out an online mail provider (such as GMail or MS Exchange Online) for a trial period, but would also like their local mail (Lotus Notes) to remain synched with the trial account so that they can compare and contrast and maintain their normal work routine both in the cloud account and in their 'local' accounts.
What is the best way to achieve a seamless 'mirroring' of both email accounts for each user so that
- emails delivered to either account will appear in the inbox of both accounts
- emails sent from either account appear in on both accounts in the 'sent items' folder
- emails moved from one folder to another in one account will automatically reflect on the other account (this is a 'nice-to-have').
The key word here is seamless. Emails sent/delivered to/from either account should retain their original senders and sendees.
Is this even possible?
We currently run an inhouse SBS Exchange 2003 box and are in the process of moving to BPOS/Exchange 2007. In our current environment if I open a calendar of someone else I can only see their Free/Busy information/availability. In BPOS if I do the same thing I can see full details of each appointment/meeting and can even open the meeting and view the contents of it.
I am not sure if we have a rule or setting in Exchange 2003 that limits calendar visibility or if there was a change to how 2007 shows calendar appointments.
Anyone have any ideas?
Thanks, Brent
We recently started using Microsoft's Hosted Exchange offering with Outlook 2010, and are very happy with it. So far we have been able to easily migrate calendars and contacts from old PST files into Exchange without any problems.
The only data still in PST files is archived email. I'm concerned about the bandwidth implications of having users upload all of their archived messages. We have a 30-40 GB of stored messages for all users combined, with some users having PST files that are several GB in size. We have three sites with the following bandwidth specs:
- Main office (25 users) is 5 Mbps / 5 Mbps
- First branch (10 users) is 5 Mbps / 512 Kbps
- Second branch (5 users) is 512 Kbps / 512 Kbps
If all the users start copying their messages into their Exchange mailboxes at once, will this kill our inter-site performance? Is Outlook/Exchange smart enough to reduce bandwidth use when the network connection is saturated, or do I need to ensure that QoS is configured before starting this?
Looking further down the road, what happens when a user with a 5 GB mailbox moves to a new computer? Does the entire 5 GB need to be re-downloaded, or can the OST from the previous computer be used to accelerate the process?
Any insight would be appreciated.
How can I forward incoming messages to a specific MTA based on the username portion of the recipient's email address? I would prefer linux-based software, but Windows would work too.
Background:
Our organization is transitioning from ISP-hosted POP3 mail to Microsoft Business Productivity Online Services (Exchange Online) and it would be nice to get coexistence working so that some users could be using the new system while other users continue to use the legacy system. As each user is migrated to the new system, their mail could be redirected to the appropriate server independent of other users and of DNS propagation.
Would this system work? Are there other migration schemes more appropriate to the scenario?
Edit 1
Our current ISP is running Postfix and Dovecot. They provide us with the ability to set up email forwarding, but only to a chosen email address. That doesn't really help us because their server will still use the MX record for delivery, which is what I want to bypass.