Background: I am using a Debian 7 system which I have integrated with an LDAP+Kerberos system using libnss-ldap
, libpam-krb5
and nscd
. I have modified sudoers
to permit an LDAP group the right to sudo
and gain super-user privileges. Hence, I can log in as an LDAP group to manage the machine. This is all working fine, and ssh
login works well with an LDAP user.
I was just experimenting with a .k5login
file in the home directory of my user account, Cosmic Ossifrage
. In the file, I listed:
[email protected]
which is a valid Kerberos identity. SSH logins as this user continued to work correctly with the .k5login
file in place.
However, with this .k5login
file in my home directory, I was no longer able to use sudo -i
to gain super-user privileges. This does not seem to make any sense, since the .k5login is in my home directory, not root
's, so to my mind, neither the root
user, nor the sudo
command, should be restricted any further than what is present in the sudoers
file.
However, with the .k5login
file as above in place, neither sudo -i
nor sudo su
were working whereas they were before. Once the .k5login
file was removed, this functionality was restored and I was able to sudo
again.
In the log file /var/log/auth.log
, among the many error messages reported at this time was one from sudo, stating:
[pam:sudo] krb5_kuserok failed for user cosmic_ossifrage
Did I miss something fundamental in the definition of what a .k5login
is supposed to do? Is this expected behaviour, and if so, why?