I have an app that uses celery and django to run distributed tasks (like send email, crawl web,etc).
The app never was in prod, so I always start celeryd with ./manage celeryd.
I want to setup a pre-post env in linux, and I will need information in how to make an init.d script for start the celeryd for django. (I had made some init.d scripts before, no need complete script just relevant part)
Thanks!
My problem is that when I do an apt-get update is trying to resolve ipv6 ips, and its failing to update/install/etc.
How to disable ipv6 at apt-get?
The ping to www.google.com.ar, resolves to an ipv4.
And this is debian runnung in an OpenVZ container.
This is in a production server and online ONE openvz cluster has this problem! Thats why I want to find other solution than disable ipv6.
Thanks!
This is the error :
[Mon Mar 01 12:19:50 2010] [error] [client XXX.XXX.248.60] mod_python (pid=9528, interpreter='realpage.com', phase='PythonHandler', handler='django.core.handlers.modpython'): Application error
[Mon Mar 01 12:19:50 2010] [error] [client XXX.XXX.248.60] ServerName: 'realpage.dom'
[Mon Mar 01 12:19:50 2010] [error] [client XXX.XXX.248.60] DocumentRoot: '/htdocs'
[Mon Mar 01 12:19:50 2010] [error] [client XXX.XXX.248.60] URI: '/'
[Mon Mar 01 12:19:50 2010] [error] [client XXX.XXX.248.60] Location: '/'
[Mon Mar 01 12:19:50 2010] [error] [client XXX.XX.248.60] Directory: None
[Mon Mar 01 12:19:50 2010] [error] [client XXX.XXX.248.60] Filename: '/htdocs'
[Mon Mar 01 12:19:50 2010] [error] [client XXX.XXX.248.60] PathInfo: '/'
[Mon Mar 01 12:19:50 2010] [error] [client XXX.XXX.248.60] Traceback (most recent call last):
[Mon Mar 01 12:19:50 2010] [error] [client XXX.XXX.248.60] File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/mod_python/importer.py", line 1537, in HandlerDispatch\n default=default_handler, arg=req, silent=hlist.silent)
[Mon Mar 01 12:19:50 2010] [error] [client XXX.XXX.248.60] File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/mod_python/importer.py", line 1229, in _process_target\n result = _execute_target(config, req, object, arg)
[Mon Mar 01 12:19:50 2010] [error] [client XXX.XXX.248.60] File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/mod_python/importer.py", line 1128, in _execute_target\n result = object(arg)
[Mon Mar 01 12:19:50 2010] [error] [client XXX.XXX.248.60] File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/django/core/handlers/modpython.py", line 228, in handler\n return ModPythonHandler()(req)
[Mon Mar 01 12:19:50 2010] [error] [client XXX.XXX.248.60] File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/django/core/handlers/modpython.py", line 220, in __call__\n req.write(chunk)
[Mon Mar 01 12:19:50 2010] [error] [client XXX.XX.248.60] IOError: Write failed, client closed connection.
Please! I am sure you need more information in order to find the bug, please tell me what and how to get it.
The error is throwing every time!
I have an Edimax EW-7318USg which comes with an Ralink rt73 and its USB. When trying to bridge (to share internet for example) it doesn't work.
But today I tried to do the same with a wired interface, the same bridge, and all of the same steps and it worked (with wired!).
Could it be that drivers, the interface or other things can't make the bridge with this WiFi interface?
I am running a lot of openvz container in server. Now I have a lot of performance issue, and I think they come from I/O since munin graph show a lot of I/O activiy.
Server is proxmox, and it was recently upgraded (this could be the problem also) But near upgrade to last version of proxmox I added a gateway in a container running shorewall.
But now is almost impossible to log in the server, rebooting makes the system usuable but after two or tree hours I/O problems come again.
There isnt too much network activiy (10kb/s) it's a home "test" server.
Any other idea in order to detect the problem? openvz container asgateway is not a good idea?
I am using the following rules in iptables in my network to use a transparent proxy
* iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -s ! squid-box -p tcp --dport 80 -j DNAT --to squid-box:3128
* iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -s local-network -d squid-box -j SNAT --to iptables-box
* iptables -A FORWARD -s local-network -d squid-box -i eth0 -o eth0 -p tcp --dport 3128 -j ACCEPT
But my squid log, always logs gateway IP (172.16.0.1)
Do you know an alternative to not lose client IP? (of course avoid saing manual proxy setup!)
What considerations would you have when deciding on installing the DCHP services onto a machine currently serving in the gateway role.
What issues/concerns/considerations would you have in this scenario. Cost isn't the concern, but rather security, maintainability. Anything else?
Ok I have an AP with ddwrt firm (i know its not the best, but continue reading!)
AP is configured to work like a wifi "transparent" brigde, also it had a virtual wifi network card to expand radius of wifi signal in that same AP. The brigde is working, computers behind AP gets ips from main routers which shares internet....BUT! I cant access webgui of the bridge AP...
Main problem : AP is lost, but its working as brigde. I cant find it in the network (it didnt have any ip!) so I cant change any configuration...
First solution : Reset AP, but it cannot be done. Reset button dont works due to a bug in ddwrt micro firm that mi linksys WAP54g had installed (I really hate this firmware I like more openwrt that my main router has)
Second Solution : arp -a from main router , from computers behind AP...It dont appears in the list.
Any more ideas, the router at some level must be there, the brigde is working.
I know its possible that the AP is with an ip like 192.168.100.2 , my subnect actually is 172.16.X.X.
:) thanks!