Excuse me by asking somehow vague. Please let me be more precise: can anybody please explain me the networktraffic between sql-server and domain-controller on a installation following microsoft windows2008R2 recommendations (nothing weird like both servers on the same machine or other fancy setup)?
Our Outlook Addin gets no events anymore since we switched from Exchange 2003 to Exchange 2010. Is there a site that explains the facts behind the scenes?
update per 2010-03-18:
Since there are no relevant info's in this thread yet, i refine my question as follows:
What are the key-words to get some relevant matches in a google-search?
Is there anybody how can explain the reason for microsoft to change the protocoll?
Is a single CPU-server ok? What about RAM and network-connection single 100MBit/S or better dual 10GBit/S? What are the parameters to decide? count of users or kind of servers in the domain like web-server or database-server like sql server 2008R2?
I logon to our citrix through web-access (native-client 12.0.0.6410 from my Win7 64-bit notebook). There is one published application: the Desktop. I can hear the start-up-sound and see the desktop, even the applications if the session was disconnected. But one mouse-click and the the Citrix-Oneline Plug-in Window becomes "not responding" and greyed out for about 3 Minutes.
After this delay everythings works fine or the window has gone away and i have to restart the login-process again...
I disabled the local drives, printers, usb-devices, micro and camera but nothing helped. What might be the reason and where to search?
Update: I believe in a problem of citrix-client or IE when asking how to access the lokal drives (none, read-only or read-write). With FireFox it connects somehow better...
How to change the disk configuration on a running system for aligning the partition and changeing the allocation unit to 64KB?
Would you adamantly refuse to administrate a misconfigured disk-system?
I read that somewhere but i dont know to which edition it belongs and how it works.
Is this the meaning that if i open the eleventh Word-document from a Fileserver i get an error-message?
How can i count the used network smb-connections?
Additional question: What about Win-7?
i have some big tables with several million records and want to change the identity(1,1) to identity(1,5). what would be the best way to do that?
DEP (Microsofts Data Execution Prevention) stopps sometimes some apps and kills it out of memory. As an administrator, may i see such events in a log and if which one?
My experience is that there is no user information as written in Help about DEP, user reported only that the desired app disappears from their screens. This happens on a Citrix-Server running on a windows-2003 R2 64-Bit Server.
Assuming the components like *.dll's, *.ocx's installed and registered on the clients there exists the possibility to place the *.exe and some related files on the fileserver. To start the application there are links on the client's desktops which runs the \\fileserver\AppPath\exe.
Would you agree with such a layout? What if 'the client' is a terminal-server and 'the clients' means a terminal-server-farm?
On a Terminalserver (win2008), we like to have an alias for the real fileservername and therefor we put a line in hosts like:
- 192.168.0.10 BigFiler
This only works fine for Fileserver under windows 2008 not for win2003-servers, why?
We do not have defined a CNAME alias that is created in the DNS zone!
I want to setup a sqlserver 2008 developeredition on my windows-vista notebook but the setup-check want me to reboot first. But this doesn't help after reboot the setup want a reboot again.
I got the tip: You can open Regedit, and modify this key"HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet?\Control\Session Manager" and delete any value in "PendingFileRenameOperations?"
That works for one try, later i have the same strange entries in this particular registry-Key. What could reenter this values?
\??\C:\Windows\TEMP\logishrd\LVPrcInj03.dll
\??\C:\Windows\TEMP\logishrd\
Edit: The Question is: how come these entry after a reboot again in there?
my first test to get a given database with activated fulltextsearch running on a sql2008 failed with the result that it creeps. sql2008 took several the time of sql2000, but why?
i have a sql-server 2005 on a win2003 32-bit (3,5GB RAM) 4 CPU Server with a RAID 5 Disk-Array which perform at 1/10 of a virtual 2008-SQL-Server Win2008 32 Bit 2GB RAM Raid 5 Server.
The Job is to delet 8,5 Mio Records out of one table of one database. After 6 hours the virtual server as a test-environment has finished the job. At the same time the productive-server has done allmost 1 Mio deletions. Whats wrong with that real win2003 server?
where to look, which parameters rule on a matter?
Peace
Ice
PS: is it unfair compairing these systems?
Layout:
i have at customer side a server (win2003 R2 SP2 standard edition 32-bit) with a sql-server 2005 and some databases. This system starts with the /3GB-Switch. The system reports 3.25 GB RAM and taskmanager reports the process of sqlserver.exe with 2758255 K as the process with the highest consumption.
The OS separates RAM for applications and for itself, normaly 50:50. But here we have the /3GB-Switch aktivated and i think the part for the applications is more than 50% of RAM.
Knowledge (or better not knowledge):
Somebody told me that if the OS runs out of memory within his part of RAM, the server runs into pressing mode.
Questions:
What is this pressing mode?
Is pressing mode possible at all in this szenario?
What should be done to get more performance out of this sql-server, beside optimizing the database and all this stuff.
Has anybody installed Chilispot or FreeRadius on Ubuntu? If yes, where are the traps? How is your experience?
Peace
Ice
I got up and running a reverse proxy on apache2 under Linux (Ubuntu). Now i see that there is a different folder-structure under Windows. My linux-conf - files don't work under windows or am i wrong?
Please show me the way
please help me in evaluating new possibilities with MS SQL Server 2008. For the last 3 years I have had an MS SQL 2000 Server Merge Replication with a Publisher and two Subscribers on duty, the backup of the database on one instance is as big as 19 GB. On each location data is inserted, updated and deleted. Everything works like a charm through a WAN with something like 10 mbit/s.
Now we change the platforms to win2008 and sql2008 and so arise new questions. The first: Is Peer-to-Peer replication a replacement for a merge-replication?
peace Ice
Update: In front of the answers, let me be more precise: We have on the publisher some tables which are not member of the replication. We also have more than one merge-replication on this database, a second separate one on some tables which were added later. (How many replicatons make sense; for each table her own replication?) There are no selections on a table so when a table is replicated all rows are delivered. Each table has an identity column. An additional Question: Are columns with type timestamp allowed with replication?