tail -f does what it's meant to do pretty well, but it's rather limited when some more control is needed, i.e. when stopping/resuming text would be useful.
Would it be possible to use less instead of tail -f?
I have setup a sendgrid relayhost on my postfix server.
This works perfectly when sending mails via sendmail:
May 24 16:21:13 ip-*-*-*-* postfix/smtp[17742]: 542D01CDF:
to=<[email protected]>, relay=smtp.sendgrid.net[5.153.47.203]:587,
delay=2, delays=0.04/0.02/1.5/0.47, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent
(250 Delivery in progress)
but when I try to send via port 587 and authenticating:
May 24 16:34:03 ip-*-*-*-* postfix/error[18081]:
46A711CDE: to=<[email protected]>, relay=none,
delay=0.61, delays=0.59/0/0/0.01, dsn=4.7.4, status=deferred
(delivery temporarily suspended: TLS is required, but was not offered
by host 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1])
Relevant config:
postconf -n | grep relayhost
relayhost = [smtp.sendgrid.net]:587
# master.cf port 587
submission inet n - - - - smtpd
-o syslog_name=postfix/submission
# -o smtpd_tls_security_level=encrypt
-o smtpd_sasl_auth_enable=yes
# -o smtpd_reject_unlisted_recipient=no
# -o smtpd_client_restrictions=$mua_client_restrictions
# -o smtpd_helo_restrictions=$mua_helo_restrictions
# -o smtpd_sender_restrictions=$mua_sender_restrictions
# -o smtpd_recipient_restrictions=permit_sasl_authenticated,reject
# -o milter_macro_daemon_name=ORIGINATING
# http://flurdy.com/docs/postfix/#config-secure-crypt
# if you do not want to restrict it encryption only, comment out next line
-o smtpd_tls_auth_only=yes
-o smtpd_client_restrictions=permit_sasl_authenticated,reject_unauth_destination,reject
-o smtpd_sasl_security_options=noanonymous,noplaintext
-o smtpd_sasl_tls_security_options=noanonymous
I have no transport file overriding anything, yet sending to the same "to" recipient yields a different relayhost depending on me using sendmail or authenticating via SASL on port 587.
Everything works perfectly while connected to port 587, and postfix replies with a "ok, sending", but it just uses a different relay.
How can I make sure that every mail that doesn't have to be delivered locally is sent via relay?
I have setup postfix to use virtual users for inbound emails, with the configuration read from mysql.
However, when I try to deliver a mail locally, using something like sendmail root@localhost < testmail, the queries are being executed, but the mail is not delivered to the virtual user directory.
The directory /var/mail/root is created instead.
Mysql config seems correct, as the following queries are executed:
SELECT destination FROM aliases WHERE mail='root@localhost' and enabled = 1
+----------------+
| destination |
+----------------+
| root@localhost |
+----------------+
SELECT destination FROM aliases WHERE mail='localhost' and enabled = 1;
Empty set (0.00 sec)
SELECT domain FROM domains WHERE domain='localhost' and enabled = 1;
+-----------+
| domain |
+-----------+
| localhost |
+-----------+
But they seem to be ignored.
When trying to login through courier IMAP, this results in the following:
1 login root@localhost <password>
* BYE [ALERT] Fatal error: No such file or directory: No such file or directory
because the folder that postfix created is not the one set in the DB for the user.
Config
(largely inspired from a guide):
alias_database = hash:/etc/postfix/aliases
alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/aliases
append_dot_mydomain = no
biff = no
config_directory = /etc/postfix
mynetworks = 127.0.0.0/8 [::ffff:127.0.0.0]/104 [::1]/128
mynetworks_style = host
myorigin = /etc/mailname
readme_directory = no
recipient_delimiter = +
# working relayhost config here
smtpd_recipient_restrictions = reject_unauth_pipelining, permit_mynetworks, reject_non_fqdn_recipient, reject_unknown_recipient_domain, reject_unauth_destination, permit
smtpd_relay_restrictions = permit_mynetworks permit_sasl_authenticated defer_unauth_destination
smtpd_sender_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, warn_if_reject reject_non_fqdn_sender, reject_unknown_sender_domain, reject_unauth_pipelining, permit
virtual_alias_maps = mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_alias.cf
virtual_gid_maps = static:5000
virtual_mailbox_base = /var/spool/mail/virtual
virtual_mailbox_domains = mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_domains.cf
virtual_mailbox_maps = mysql:/etc/postfix/mysql_mailbox.cf
virtual_uid_maps = static:5000
Situation:
- test website created in IIS server manager
- basic settings/connect as: Application user
- authentication/anonymous authentication/edit: application pool identity
- physical path has "IIS AppPool\DefaultAppPool" read and execute, list folder contents and read permissions (plus administrators/system with inherited full control)
- contains a single file, index.html (plus generated web.config with the above settings)
Errors:
- HTTP Error 500.19 - Internal Server Error
- Config Error Cannot read configuration file due to insufficient permissions
Questions:
- how do I make it work with app identity? (got it to work using using iusr both under anonymous auth and with rx permission on the physical folder)
- am I doing it wrong or this is indeed the best practice as most resources I've found seem to suggest?
I'd also really appreciate any good tutorials on the "basics" of IIS 7.5 - I have been unable to find answers to this specific questions on learn.iis.net and several other sites and generally found the resources available there very fragmented.
Related: IIS 7.5 web site directory permisions, Windows Server 2008 R2 - IIS7.5 - Web site permissions
I have managed to get imagemagick working (tested using the command line example on their website)
It also appears that the php extension is correctly installed: I can see it listed in my phpinfo(); list.
However, when I try to run the following code:
$im = new imagick( 'examples.jpg' );
$im->thumbnailImage( 200, 0);
$im->writeImage( 'a_thumbnail.jpg' );
The execution stops at the second line, because it cannot find the thumbnailImage method.
What I can think of is that some user doesn't have enough privileges to access/run something else, but I obviously cannot give user access to everything.
Another possibility is that the PHP extension I'm using is not the suitable one for the latest imagemagick distribution.
Considering a machine with IIS 7.5/PHP 5.2/asp.net and mysql/MSSQL available, which webmail would you pick? Don't think it's relevant but the mail server is installed on localhost, and is hmailserver.
If it's one using asp.net it'd be a bonus, but PHP is ok as well and probably offers more choices.
"Client side" look and feel definitely needed, flash/silverlight/ajax not a problem.
I have also seen this question, but being asked almost 2years ago and being focused on php webmails, I thought that some better option could've been released in the meantime.
EDIT:
Has anybody had any experience with afterlogic webmail? Considering this or horde.
I have installed PHP 5.2.13 through Web Platform Installer on IIS 7.5/windows 2008 R2
Now I'm trying to install additional PHP extensions, such as mcrypt, so I downloaded the compiled .zip file from the php windows binaries site.
I put the relevant dlls in the extensions folder, and added the lines in the php.ini:
[PHP_MCRYPT]
extension=php_mcrypt.dll
After restarting IIS, no application was working.
This was with VC6 compiled/non thread-safe compiled version of PHP 5.2.13 .zip package.
I also tried with the thread-safe version, which prevented IIS to restart and forced me to reboot the server.
What am I doing wrong here?
I have a fresh install of IIS 7 - I just added Web Platform Installer, and PHP 5.2 thru that.
However, when trying to access to a simple test.php file (just has phpinfo() in it), I get the following list of errors:
• IIS was not able to access the web.config file for the Web site or application.
This can occur if the NTFS permissions are set incorrectly.
• IIS was not able to process configuration for the Web site or application.
• The authenticated user does not have permission to use this DLL.
• The request is mapped to a managed handler but the .NET Extensibility Feature
is not installed.
The domain was created with dot net panel, but I don't think that has to do with this problem, unless maybe it uses a specific user?
Is it possible that there's an issue with permissions?
Maybe I need to add php thruough dot net panel?
Any idea of what I'm doing wrong here?